|
May 2010
|
May 2006
|
April 2006
|
July 2005
|
May 2005
|
Feb 2005
|
Sep 2004
|
Aug 2004
|
July 2004
|
April 2004
Changes to the depreciation regime arose from an
officials' paper released in July 2004. The proposed changes were
announced in the May 2005 budget.
Since the budget the Finance and Expenditure
Select Committee has been reviewing the Bill. The process was drawn out
due to the election in the middle of the process. The Committee has now
made its recommendations back to parliament on the Bill and the
recommendations have been accepted, the Bill passed through its final
stages in Parliament on 22 March and it received Royal assent on 3rd
April 2006.
The changes are as follows
Please note that where Plant and Equipment is
referred to in the following text it equates to rental property Fit-out
and Chattels.
Plant and Equipment purchased prior
to 1 April 2005 and for buildings prior to 19 May 2005.
There is no change to the depreciation rates for these assets.
Plant and Equipment purchased after
1 April 2005.
The new formula for calculating the depreciation rates is known as a
double declining balance. For plant and equipment with a short life
basis this will increase the depreciation rate to apply. The effect of
this to the investor is as the item is depreciated quicker they will
get the use of this money sooner.
Note the Committee made one change that is
intended to make this transition easier and reduce costs for tax payers
with assets already purchased in the 2005-06 income year (they will not
have to re-enter the new depreciation rates). The option is that the
taxpayer may use the old depreciation rates for plant and equipment
acquired in the 2005-06 income year and that the new depreciation
method only be required for plant and equipment acquired from the
beginning of the 2006-07 income year.
Buildings Purchased on or after 19
May 2005.
These buildings are subject to a new (decreased) depreciation rate.
This rate is to apply from the 2005-06 tax year and subsequent years.
Although the rate has decreased over the long term you will still be
able to obtain the same amount of depreciation out of the building, it
will just take slightly longer.
What if I had a binding contract to purchase in
place before 19 May?
Note if there was a binding contract for purchase or construction in
place before 19 May 2005 then the rates to apply are:
Plant and Equipment : as if acquired before 1
April 2005.
Building : as if acquired before 19 May 2005.
Limited recognition for Associated
Party transfers.
One change from that announced in the budget is that, in very limited
circumstances, where buildings are transferred between associated
parties after 19 May 2005 the current depreciation rates would apply.
The only circumstances where this can happen are:
- Companies - transfers between companies that
are 100% owned companies;
- Individuals - transfers of relationship
property between husbands and wives or de facto partners (including
same sex partners)
Change to the low value asset
threshold.
This has been increased from $200 to $500 for items acquired on or
after 19 May 2005. This allows a higher immediate deduction if the
expenditure is a capital cost.
The Rates
The building depreciation rate has been reduced
from 4% Diminishing value to 3%. - This is a 25% reduction and if an
apportionment is not completed for an investment property this will
have a major impact. The good news is that the rates for Fit-out and
chattels have increased so some of the reduction in building
depreciation can be offset. The following shows what the old and new
rates are for Plant & Equipment (Fit-out and chattels)
|
Economic life (years)
|
Old provisions
D.V. rate
|
Double declining balance
(New rates)
D.V. rate
|
|
2
|
63.50%
|
100%
|
|
3
|
50%
|
66.70%
|
|
4
|
40%
|
50%
|
|
5
|
33%
|
40%
|
|
6.66
|
26%
|
30%
|
|
8
|
22%
|
25%
|
|
10
|
18%
|
20%
|
|
12.5
|
15%
|
16%
|
|
15.5
|
12%
|
13%
|
|
20
|
9.50%
|
10%
|
|
25
|
7.50%
|
8%
|
|
33.3
|
6%
|
6%
|
|
50
|
4%
|
4%
|
|
100
|
2%
|
2%
|
Examples - what does it mean to our
cash flow?
When you compare the depreciation using the old
and new rates it actually means very little.
|
NEW PROPERTY
|
|
First Year Depreciation
|
|
|
|
Purchase
apportionment
|
Old Rates
|
New Rates
|
|
Land
|
$
128,947.00 |
~
|
~
|
|
Building
|
$
176,280.00 |
7,051.20 |
5,288.40 |
|
Fit-out and chattels
|
$
139,773.00 |
23,084.50 |
26,101.20
|
|
|
$
445,000.00 |
$
30,135.70 |
$31,389.60
|
|
$
1,253.90 |
MORE depreciation in year one
|
|
|
|
OLDER PROPERTY
|
First Year Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
apportionment
|
Old Rates
|
New Rates
|
|
Land
|
$
105,892.00 |
~
|
~
|
|
Building
|
$
119,471.00 |
4,778.68 |
3,584.13 |
|
Fit-out and chattels
|
$
69,637.00 |
6,942.10 |
7,480.64 |
|
|
$
295,000.00 |
$
11,720.78 |
$11,064.77
|
|
-$
656.01 |
LESS depreciation in year one
|
|
|
It isn't really worth worrying about!
There is still one unanswered
question!
What items of Fit-out will IRD allow to be
separated from the building structure?
Well this is a question that we have been
searching for answers on for many years. When the officials paper was
released in July 2004 it sought responses to many questions such as how
building fit-out should be dealt with for investment property as well
as the proposed rate changes to 3% for buildings and double declining
for Plant and Equipment. In the 2005 budget the rate changes were
announced and this is what we are talking about in this article. There
was no mention of the building Fit-out issue.
There is still confusion over this and I am again
pressing for answers. The Finance and Expenditure select committee that
reviewed the Bill has also agreed to follow up on the building fit-out
issue for me. I wrote to them in February explaining the situation and
I have recently had a reply that they are looking into it and hope to
have it resolved for us shortly. I have also written to a very
prominent politician who is personally following up on the issue for me.
Hopefully we will have some answers on this one
soon.
In the meantime happy investing and if you do
incur issues with IRD over depreciation please let me know.
Steve Tucker
Managing Director
Valuit Asset Appraisals Ltd
|